申晚营
摘 要：从知识迁移史的方面出发，重塑留学生在海外的“学术网络”，构成了留学内史具体研究的一种基本思路。通过发掘爱荷华大学与约翰斯·霍普金斯大学藏留学档案，可以清晰钩沉出张慰慈与和张忠绂在美求学时的政治学科知识生成轨迹，从而对他们在1930年的主权学说论争进行追本溯源的解读。两人的焦点问题是应该倡导多元还是一元主权说，双方虽然代表了不同的学术流派，但接续的都是整个西方政治学界的学术传统。考察这场学术交锋，一方面须将之置入当时世界政治学发展脉络下审视，一方面要关注不同历史时段归国留学生对中国政治现状和前景的不同反思。
关键词：留学内史；张慰慈；张忠绂；主权学说；知识迁移史
【作者】申晚营，北京外国语大学博士。
【Title】Homology and Dissimilarity: The Political Genealogy of Chang Tso-Shuen and Chang Chung-fu and the Debate on Their Sovereignty Theory
Abstract：From the perspective of knowledge transfer history, reshaping the overseas students’ “academic network” constitutes a basic idea for the specific study of the internal history of studying abroad. By exploring the archives of the University of Iowa and Johns Hopkins University, we can clearly understand the track of the generation of political discipline knowledge of Chang Tso-Shuen and Chang Chung-fu when they were studying in the United States, so that we can trace back to the origin of their debate on sovereign theory in 1930. The focus of the two is whether they should advocate the theory of pluralism or monism of sovereignty. Although they represent different academic schools, they continue the academic tradition of the entire Western political science community. To investigate this academic confrontation, on the one hand, we should put it into the context of the development of world politics at that time, and on the other hand, we should pay attention to the different reflections of returned students on China’s political status and prospects in different historical periods.
Key words: Internal history of studying abroad, Chang Tso-Shuen, Chang Chung-fu, Sovereign theory, History of knowledge transfer